New Report by disAbility Law Center of Virginia Exposes Systemic Failures and Rights Violations in State’s Involuntary Commitment Process
Media Contact
Colleen Miller, Executive Director
Colleen.Miller@dLCV.org | (804) 225-2042
RICHMOND, VA — The disAbility Law Center of Virginia (dLCV) has released a comprehensive new report, “Between Custody and Care: The Flawed Involuntary Commitment System in Virginia,” detailing a traumatic and disorganized system that often prioritizes restraint over recovery. Based on a statewide survey of individuals who recently navigated the Emergency Custody Order (ECO) and Temporary Detention Order (TDO) processes, the findings reveal a systemic failure to protect the civil liberties of Virginians in mental health crisis.
Disturbing Trends in Custody and Restraint
The report highlights a “sprawling, complicated path” where thousands of Virginians must navigate a system that lacks instructions, clarity, and even basic data collection and assessment. Key findings include:
- Routine Use of Restraints: Rather than being used as a last resort, handcuffs and physical restraints appear to be routine practice.
- Prolonged Restraint: Individuals reported remaining handcuffed for hours or even days while in police custody.
- Lack of Accommodation: People with physical and developmental disabilities reported a significant lack of effective communication and accommodation, particularly from law enforcement. One deaf individual reported being handcuffed to a bed, despite it preventing them from using sign language to communicate.
A Breakdown of Due Process
The survey results suggest that most Virginians entering this process are never properly informed of their rights.
- Voluntary Admission Denied: 65% of respondents who met with a pre-screener reported that the option of voluntary hospitalization was never discussed.
- Legal Representation Failures: Respondents’ extreme dissatisfaction with their court-appointed attorneys, describing them as “rubber stamps” or “just there as a formality”.
- Inaccessible Appeals: While individuals under a TDO have a legal right to appeal, the process is frequently inaccessible due to sedation, misinformation, or the inability to contact their attorneys. Only one out of 79 respondents successfully appealed their commitment.
“
“I felt left out of the process, even though I was an integral part of it.”
— S., Survey Respondent
Urgent Recommendations for Reform
To transition from a system of control to a system of care, dLCV recommends the following systemic actions:
- Statewide Restraint Standards: Amend the Virginia code to limit handcuffs and restraints to true emergencies involving real and imminent danger.
- Mandatory Training: Require initial and periodic training for law enforcement, pre-screeners, and attorneys on disability rights, accessibility, and accommodations.
- Plain-Language Materials: Develop protocols to ensure patients are adequately informed of the process and their right to appeal using accessible, plain-language formats.
- Improved Data Collection: Require state agencies to track and report data on the use of “paperless” ECOs and the duration and type of restraints used during the process.
“
“These findings show that restraints, lack of information, and exclusion from decision-making are not isolated incidents but patterns that strip people of autonomy and deepen trauma,” the report concludes.
About the disAbility Law Center of Virginia (dLCV):
The dLCV is the Commonwealth’s Protection and Advocacy Program, tasked with providing a wide range of services to Virginians with disabilities. dLCV’s is to advance independence, choice and self-determination; protect legal, human and civil rights; and eliminate abuse, neglect and discrimination of people with disabilities through zealous and uncompromising legal advocacy and representation.
Reports
-
Between Custody and Care: The Flawed Involuntary Commitment System in Virginia
Download our Report: “Between Custody and Care: The Flawed Involuntary Commitment System in Virginia,” [PDF]
